Zollege is here for to help you!!

Trending Colleges Upcoming Coming Exams

Need Counselling

MAT Intelligence and Critical Reasoning Syllabus 2026

Zollege Team

Content Curator | Updated On - Oct 13, 2026

MAT Intelligence and Critical Reasoning has 30 questions covering logical and analytical skills. Prepare conditions, arrangements and relationships alongside conclusions, assumptions and arguments. The central difference is between an answer that is possible and one that the given information actually proves.

MAT Intelligence and Critical Reasoning Syllabus

This section combines two tasks: organising conditions and judging what follows from an argument. AIMA's sample includes team formation, statement-conclusion, assertion-reason and family-relation questions. Use the following topic groups to organise broader reasoning practice.

Topic	Preparation coverage
Arrangements and team formation	Positions, grouping, inclusion/exclusion and linked conditions
Relations and directions	Family relationships, relative positions, routes and orientation
Statements and conclusions	What follows from the given facts; necessary versus possible conclusions
Arguments and assumptions	Premise, conclusion, unstated support, strengthening and weakening
Assertion and reason	Truth of each statement and whether the reason explains the assertion
Series, coding and analogies	Patterns, transformations and relationships between terms
Set-based logic	Groups, overlap, syllogisms and valid deductions

The sample is a guide to skills, not an exhaustive chapter list or a fixed topic-wise question distribution. An arrangement puzzle and an assumption question need different methods even though both sit within the same section.

Analytical Reasoning: Arrangements and Relations

Write conditions before trying options

Consider an original team-selection example: choose two people from A, B and C. If A is selected, B must also be selected. The valid teams are AB and BC; AC fails the condition. The rule does not say that choosing B requires A, so BC remains possible.

For a larger set, separate compulsory conditions from alternatives. "A is before B" leaves room for several positions; "A is immediately before B" makes a linked pair. Turning both statements into the same diagram discards a material condition.

Possible is different from definite

If an option works in one valid arrangement, it may be possible. To prove it must be true, it must hold in every valid arrangement. A single valid counterexample is enough to reject a claimed certainty.

Do not fill gaps in family information

If P is Q's sibling and Q is R's mother, P is R's mother's sibling. Without P's gender, calling P an uncle rather than an aunt adds information the statement did not give. Draw only the relationships actually stated.

Critical Reasoning: Assumptions and Conclusions

Question type	Task
Conclusion	What must follow from the stated information?
Assumption	What unstated condition does the argument rely on?
Strengthen	Which added fact supports the argument?
Weaken	Which added fact challenges the argument?
Assertion-reason	Are both true, and does the reason explain the assertion?

Find the conclusion being defended

In "The library should extend evening hours because many working members cannot visit during the day", the recommendation is the conclusion. Limited daytime access is the stated reason. An assumption might concern whether those members can use the proposed evening hours.

A survey showing that many of those members would attend in the evening strengthens the recommendation. It is additional support, not a statement already contained in the original argument. A finding that the proposed hours clash with their work would weaken the reasoning.

Use a counterexample for conclusions

From "All red tokens are circles" and "Some circles are large", it does not follow that some red tokens are large. The large circles could all be a different colour. Sketching that possibility tests the claim more reliably than assuming the groups overlap.

Separate truth from explanation

For assertion-reason questions, first decide whether each statement is true. Then ask whether the reason explains the assertion. Two true statements can describe different facts without one causing or explaining the other.

Reasoning Questions and Weightage

Intelligence and Critical Reasoning contains 30 questions in the 150-question MAT paper. The whole test lasts 120 minutes. The section accounts for 20% of the questions, and all five sections contribute equally to the composite score.

An incorrect answer attracts a 0.25-mark penalty. There is no fixed count of arrangement, family-relation or argument questions established by the official sample. Prepare the different reasoning tasks instead of treating a sample set as a prediction of the next paper.

Preparing and Reviewing Reasoning Sets

Mistake	Review method
One arrangement treated as the only arrangement	Try a second arrangement satisfying every condition
If A then B read backwards	Test whether B can occur without A
Family gender invented	Mark unspecified gender as unknown
Outside fact used in a conclusion	Return to the statements and remove the extra assumption
Both assertion and reason true	Check the explanatory link separately

After an arrangement set, reconstruct the deductions without looking at the answer. Mark the clue that fixed each position. If you can reach the solution only by guessing an option and working backwards, try a fresh set requiring the same relation.

For argument questions, write the premise and conclusion in separate lines. Then explain what a chosen option changes: a missing assumption, stronger evidence or a competing explanation. This keeps a reasonable-sounding sentence from being mistaken for the answer to a different question type.

Use the MAT reasoning book recommendations for topic exercises. Keep a second practice track for Data Sufficiency: both use logical checks, but sufficiency asks whether the information fixes an answer, not simply whether an arrangement can be drawn.

In a mixed set, record whether an error came from reading the condition, representing it, making a deduction or choosing the option. Repeating the whole chapter is less targeted than repairing the step that failed.

Reasoning Topics to Cover

−

Topic	Study coverage
Arrangements and team formation	Positions, grouping, inclusion/exclusion and linked conditions
Relations and directions	Family relationships, relative positions, routes and orientation
Statements and conclusions	What follows from the given facts; necessary versus possible conclusions
Arguments and assumptions	Premise, conclusion, unstated support, strengthening and weakening
Assertion and reason	Truth of each statement and whether the reason explains the assertion
Series, coding and analogies	Patterns, transformations and relationships between terms
Set-based logic	Groups, overlap, syllogisms and valid deductions

Current section count: 30 questions.

Test a Reasoning Condition

−

Choose two from A, B and C. If A is selected, B must be selected.

Team	Result
AB	Valid
AC	Invalid: A requires B
BC	Valid: selecting B does not require A

The rule is one-way. Reversing it would wrongly eliminate BC.

Critical Reasoning Question Types

−

Question type	Task
Conclusion	What must follow from the stated information?
Assumption	What unstated condition does the argument rely on?
Strengthen	Which added fact supports the argument?
Weaken	Which added fact challenges the argument?
Assertion-reason	Are both true, and does the reason explain the assertion?

Identify the conclusion before deciding whether an option supports or challenges it.

Review Reasoning Mistakes

−

Mistake	Correction
One arrangement treated as the only arrangement	Try a second arrangement satisfying every condition
If A then B read backwards	Test whether B can occur without A
Family gender invented	Mark unspecified gender as unknown
Outside fact used in a conclusion	Return to the statements and remove the extra assumption
Both assertion and reason true	Check the explanatory link separately

MAT reasoning practice resources

MAT Intelligence and Critical Reasoning FAQs

Is critical reasoning the same as an arrangement puzzle?+

No. An arrangement puzzle organises given conditions into possible positions or groups. Critical reasoning examines an argument, its conclusion and the evidence or assumptions supporting it.

If an option fits my diagram, must it be correct?+

It depends on the question. An option that fits one valid diagram may be possible without being compulsory.

For "could be true", one valid case may establish possibility.
For "must be true", test whether the statement survives every permitted case.
For "cannot be true", show that the statement conflicts with the conditions.

Try to construct a second valid arrangement before treating your first diagram as the only solution.

Does "if A, then B" mean "if B, then A"?+

No. A being selected may require B, while B may still be selected without A. The team example above permits BC even though A is absent.

Can general knowledge decide a statement-conclusion question?+

Use the stated information and the task's directions. An outside fact may be true but still fail to establish the conclusion from the supplied statements.

Are 15 or 20 questions the total reasoning section?+

The current official MAT structure assigns 30 questions to Intelligence and Critical Reasoning. A smaller practice set or an older topic split is not the full-section count.

Does a long puzzle always deserve more time?+

Its length alone does not tell you how quickly you can solve it. Check whether the conditions produce clear deductions. In review, identify the clue that unlocked the set and where you spent time without making a new deduction.

*The article might have information for the previous academic years, please refer the official website of the exam.

SHARE ON FACEBOOK SHARE ON TWITTER